Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 34Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 85
Page 10
of Evidence . Notice the change between the American Law Institute and Uniform Law Commissioners . Uniform Law Commissioners took over where the other group left off . The Uniform Rules of Evidence were approved after committee of ...
of Evidence . Notice the change between the American Law Institute and Uniform Law Commissioners . Uniform Law Commissioners took over where the other group left off . The Uniform Rules of Evidence were approved after committee of ...
Page 12
This is certainly a desirable step forward and eliminates the mumbojumbo , meaningless hypothetical question which delavs trials . confuses witnesses and fails to aid the trier of the facts The Uniform Rules of Evidence specifically ...
This is certainly a desirable step forward and eliminates the mumbojumbo , meaningless hypothetical question which delavs trials . confuses witnesses and fails to aid the trier of the facts The Uniform Rules of Evidence specifically ...
Page 14
we have in Idaho , it is the decision to adopt the Uniform Rules of Evidence , we should repeal directly the statutes which the Rules are designed to supplant . I have in mind the rules of procedure we have which supplant the existing ...
we have in Idaho , it is the decision to adopt the Uniform Rules of Evidence , we should repeal directly the statutes which the Rules are designed to supplant . I have in mind the rules of procedure we have which supplant the existing ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities administration adopted amended American ANDERSON annual appear appointed attorney Bar Association believe BELLWOOD BLAINE Board Boise California Chairman client Commission Commissioners Committee conference considered continue corporation counsel County course defendant discussion District District Bar Division doctor effect evidence examination experience fact feel filed further give going hearing Idaho State Bar important injury interest involved John Judge judicial jurisdiction jury Justice lawyers legislation legislature matter mean meeting MERRILL motion move organization passed person practice prepared present President problem procedure proposed question reason recommendations represent resolution result Rules statement statute Supreme Court tell Thank thing Third tion tort trial Uniform vote witness