Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 34Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 73
Page 32
I have worked on this inferior courts committee for two or three years , and this recommendation , of course ... so as to read the recommendations we have proposed be merely recommendations to whatever legislative or whatever committee ...
I have worked on this inferior courts committee for two or three years , and this recommendation , of course ... so as to read the recommendations we have proposed be merely recommendations to whatever legislative or whatever committee ...
Page 36
Courts Committee of the Idaho State Bar , and as soon as possible report its recommendations as to whether or not such rules should be adopted , to the Commissioners of the Idaho State Bar , and be it further RESOLVED , That upon ...
Courts Committee of the Idaho State Bar , and as soon as possible report its recommendations as to whether or not such rules should be adopted , to the Commissioners of the Idaho State Bar , and be it further RESOLVED , That upon ...
Page 128
Nevertheless , it is felt that the following proposals and recommendations meet with the approval of a majority of the committee : JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS 1. The Board of Commissioners should forthwith appoint a standing State Bar ...
Nevertheless , it is felt that the following proposals and recommendations meet with the approval of a majority of the committee : JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS 1. The Board of Commissioners should forthwith appoint a standing State Bar ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities administration adopted amended American ANDERSON annual appear appointed attorney Bar Association believe BELLWOOD BLAINE Board Boise California Chairman client Commission Commissioners Committee conference considered continue corporation counsel County course defendant discussion District District Bar Division doctor effect evidence examination experience fact feel filed further give going hearing Idaho State Bar important injury interest involved John Judge judicial jurisdiction jury Justice lawyers legislation legislature matter mean meeting MERRILL motion move organization passed person practice prepared present President problem procedure proposed question reason recommendations represent resolution result Rules statement statute Supreme Court tell Thank thing Third tion tort trial Uniform vote witness