Profiles in Injustice: Why Racial Profiling Cannot Work

Front Cover
The New Press, 2003 - Political Science - 303 pages
Why racial profiling is not just wrong, but ineffective too. Racial profilingas practiced by police officers, highway troopers, and customs officialsis one of America's most explosive public issues. But even as protest against the practice has swelled, police forces and others across the country continue to argue that profiling is an effective crime-fighting tool. In Profiles in Injustice, David Harrisdescribed by the Seattle Times as "America's leading authority on racial profiling"dismantles those arguments, drawing on a wealth of newly available statistics to show convincingly that profiling is not only morally and legally wrong, but also startlingly ineffectual at preventing crime or apprehending criminals. A new chapter considers how the events of September 11 have recast the racial profiling issue, tipping public opinion in favor of the policy as a tool in fighting terrorism.
 

What people are saying - Write a review

Profiles in injustice: why racial profiling cannot work

User Review  - Not Available - Book Verdict

Harris is a law professor at the University of Toledo and a Soror Senior Justice Fellow who has written widely on racial profiling, stop and frisk, and other Fourth Amendment issues. In this monograph ... Read full review

Contents

24857 CH01pdf
1
24857 CH02pdf
16
24857 CH03pdf
48
24857 CH04pdf
73
24857 CH05pdf
91
24857 CH06pdf
129
24857 CH07pdf
145
24857 CH08pdf
208
24857 CH09pdf
223
24857 CH10pdf
241
24857 Notespdf
247
24857 Indexpdf
285
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2003)

David A. Harris is Balk Professor of Law and Values at the University of Toledo College of Law, and a Soros Senior Justice Fellow. He lives in Ohio.

Bibliographic information