## Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 9, Part 2American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1990 - Arctic regions |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 60

Page 104

Eiper iaenl Gaussian 6.0 Fig.26 Effect of time varying slow motion hydrodynamic force coefficient on p.d.f. peak

Eiper iaenl Gaussian 6.0 Fig.26 Effect of time varying slow motion hydrodynamic force coefficient on p.d.f. peak

**frequency**of wave = 6.0[rad/sec] o. G 0.1 0. 2 0 . 0 3.0 :M a . Dw - Tiae Varying ;Ma- Const.Page 138

The low

The low

**frequency**component of the local body motion is By a similar reasoning , the drag force on the splash zone ( Eq . ( 38 ) ) becomes ÁL ( t ) [ 2 ) ( 2 ) #walko ) * l ( t ) = ( 53 ) = TT XL ( ) , fde ( t ) = CCO ( 46 ) ŬLt ) in ...Page 140

Viscous Forces on a Compliant Structure In the time domain , the response to the drag force is evaluated explicitly by defining the nonlinear drag terms , whereas in the

Viscous Forces on a Compliant Structure In the time domain , the response to the drag force is evaluated explicitly by defining the nonlinear drag terms , whereas in the

**frequency**domain they are expressed in terms of the waveinduced ...### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY PART | 33 |

Extreme Forces on Large AxiSymmetric Offshore Structures in Directional Seas | 49 |

RELIABILITYBASED DESIGN AND INSPECTION | 55 |

Copyright | |

14 other sections not shown

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

analysis applied approach approximately assessment assumed average basic calculated coefficient component computed considered constant corresponding cost crack growth curve cycles damage defect density depends depth derived described determined developed deviation distribution drag effects Engineering equation equivalent estimated evaluated example expected extreme factor failure failure probability fatigue Figure force fracture frequency function geometry given important included increase indicated initial inspection integration joints limit linear load Lognormal material maximum mean measured mechanics method normal obtained offshore structures operation parameters performed period platform predicted present pressure probabilistic probability procedure random variable range ratio reference relative reliability represent requirements respectively response risk safety sensitivity shown shows significant simulation standard statistical storm strength stress structure surface Table tension tether tubular uncertainty variables variation wave wave height weld