Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 9, Part 2American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1990 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 42
... load factor , covering dynamic effects . The last two were used in the calibration of the uncertainties associated with earthquake design and to derive seismic load and resistance factors . These jackets stood in 70 and 225m of water ...
... load factor , covering dynamic effects . The last two were used in the calibration of the uncertainties associated with earthquake design and to derive seismic load and resistance factors . These jackets stood in 70 and 225m of water ...
Page 44
... load was the dominant action . Horizontal braces had a more uniform spread of the axial load component but they were not as heavily utilised as the diagonal braces . Deck and jacket legs were sometimes relatively well utilised as were ...
... load was the dominant action . Horizontal braces had a more uniform spread of the axial load component but they were not as heavily utilised as the diagonal braces . Deck and jacket legs were sometimes relatively well utilised as were ...
Page 45
... load factor can be evaluated in two ways . Firstly , in accordance with the tabulated approach for determining load and resistance factors outside the scope of LRFD which provided the estimated values in Table 8 . Secondly , via eqn 3 ...
... load factor can be evaluated in two ways . Firstly , in accordance with the tabulated approach for determining load and resistance factors outside the scope of LRFD which provided the estimated values in Table 8 . Secondly , via eqn 3 ...
Contents
Investigation of the Ergodicity Assumption for Sea States in the Reliability Assessment of Offshore | 1 |
OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY PART | 19 |
Fatigue Loading | 33 |
Copyright | |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
analysis applied approach approximately assessment assumed average basic calculated coefficient component computed considered constant corresponding cost crack growth curve cycles damage defect density depends depth derived described determined developed deviation distribution drag effects Engineering equation equivalent estimated evaluated example expected extreme factor failure failure probability fatigue Figure force fracture frequency function geometry given important included increase indicated initial inspection integration joints limit linear load Lognormal material maximum mean measured mechanics method normal obtained offshore structures operation parameters performed period platform predicted present pressure probabilistic probability procedure random variable range ratio reference relative reliability represent requirements respectively response risk safety shown shows significant simulation standard statistical storm strength stress structure surface Table tension tether tubular uncertainty variables variation wave wave height weld