## Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 9, Part 2American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1990 - Arctic regions |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 66

Page 171

This source of variability is usually referred to as uncertainty , that is variability in

This source of variability is usually referred to as uncertainty , that is variability in

**predicted**results due to a lack of knowledge or modeling of the physical process . This source of variability is , many times , one of the major ...Page 172

The effect of the stress - strain behavior on the instability load variability is small in comparison to the effect of the J - Resistance curve variability on the

The effect of the stress - strain behavior on the instability load variability is small in comparison to the effect of the J - Resistance curve variability on the

**predicted**maximum loads . When it is recalled that the artificial ...Page 208

34 кв SB f max ' m ' Stress Range AS ( MPa ) 1000 * Fatigue Test Data Scatter Band

34 кв SB f max ' m ' Stress Range AS ( MPa ) 1000 * Fatigue Test Data Scatter Band

**Predicted**Mean and Mean | 2s m '**Predicted**Mean and Mean 2s by Engesvik and Moan K f max variables , KA f max ' Os and of Therefore , the statistical ...### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

Investigation of the Ergodicity Assumption for Sea States in the Reliability Assessment of Offshore | 1 |

OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY PART | 33 |

Extreme Forces on Large AxiSymmetric Offshore Structures in Directional Seas | 49 |

Copyright | |

15 other sections not shown

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

analysis applied approach approximately assessment assumed average basic calculated coefficient component computed considered constant corresponding cost crack growth curve cycles damage defect density depends depth derived described determined developed deviation distribution drag effects Engineering equation equivalent estimated evaluated example expected extreme factor failure failure probability fatigue Figure force fracture frequency function geometry given important included increase indicated initial inspection integration joints limit linear load Lognormal material maximum mean measured mechanics method normal obtained offshore structures operation parameters performed period platform predicted present pressure probabilistic probability procedure random variable range ratio reference relative reliability represent requirements respectively response risk safety sensitivity shown shows significant simulation standard statistical storm strength stress structure surface Table tension tether tubular uncertainty variables variation wave wave height weld