Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 9, Part 2American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1990 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 80
Page 61
... shown in Figure 3 . For a reliability index of 8 = 4.26 importance factors have been derived as shown in Table 3 . It is noted that the material yield strength , the vertical first order and the response uncertainty show the largest ...
... shown in Figure 3 . For a reliability index of 8 = 4.26 importance factors have been derived as shown in Table 3 . It is noted that the material yield strength , the vertical first order and the response uncertainty show the largest ...
Page 104
... shown in Figs . 24 ~ 27 . They are also compared with theoreti- cal estimates for the waves with a mean wave frequency 4.5 or 7.5 rad / sec and a significant waveheight 10 cm , shown in Figs . 28 ~ 31 . Figs . 24 ~ 27 say that the ...
... shown in Figs . 24 ~ 27 . They are also compared with theoreti- cal estimates for the waves with a mean wave frequency 4.5 or 7.5 rad / sec and a significant waveheight 10 cm , shown in Figs . 28 ~ 31 . Figs . 24 ~ 27 say that the ...
Page 166
... shown in figure 7 . They indicate that an averaging period of half an hour or more gives good estimates for Mo. A one half hour initial averaging period is therefore acceptable . The data sampling and averaging procedure used by our ...
... shown in figure 7 . They indicate that an averaging period of half an hour or more gives good estimates for Mo. A one half hour initial averaging period is therefore acceptable . The data sampling and averaging procedure used by our ...
Contents
Investigation of the Ergodicity Assumption for Sea States in the Reliability Assessment of Offshore | 1 |
OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY PART | 19 |
Fatigue Loading | 33 |
Copyright | |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
analysis applied approach approximately assessment assumed average basic calculated coefficient component computed considered constant corresponding cost crack growth curve cycles damage defect density depends depth derived described determined developed deviation distribution drag effects Engineering equation equivalent estimated evaluated example expected extreme factor failure failure probability fatigue Figure force fracture frequency function geometry given important included increase indicated initial inspection integration joints limit linear load Lognormal material maximum mean measured mechanics method normal obtained offshore structures operation parameters performed period platform predicted present pressure probabilistic probability procedure random variable range ratio reference relative reliability represent requirements respectively response risk safety shown shows significant simulation standard statistical storm strength stress structure surface Table tension tether tubular uncertainty variables variation wave wave height weld