Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 9, Part 2American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1990 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 51
Page 104
... simulation 1 ) is in good agree- ment with experiments , and is the best estimate of the three . It is shown that the simulation 1 ) represents a slow drift motion in reality . These figures show that by neglecting time varying of Ma or ...
... simulation 1 ) is in good agree- ment with experiments , and is the best estimate of the three . It is shown that the simulation 1 ) represents a slow drift motion in reality . These figures show that by neglecting time varying of Ma or ...
Page 112
... simulation and equivalent stochastic quadratization are in good agreement . The vertical lines mark the computed mean responses and clearly indicate that the simulated and equivalent stochastic quadratization responses are skewed . The ...
... simulation and equivalent stochastic quadratization are in good agreement . The vertical lines mark the computed mean responses and clearly indicate that the simulated and equivalent stochastic quadratization responses are skewed . The ...
Page 209
... simulation since their welding parameters were nearly similar to the 6 mm butt weldments11 . Monte Carlo simulations for three different R ratio ( -1.0 , -.33 and 0 ) were performed , and the results are given in Table 3. The mean S - N ...
... simulation since their welding parameters were nearly similar to the 6 mm butt weldments11 . Monte Carlo simulations for three different R ratio ( -1.0 , -.33 and 0 ) were performed , and the results are given in Table 3. The mean S - N ...
Contents
Investigation of the Ergodicity Assumption for Sea States in the Reliability Assessment of Offshore | 1 |
OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY PART | 19 |
Fatigue Loading | 33 |
Copyright | |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
analysis applied approach approximately assessment assumed average basic calculated coefficient component computed considered constant corresponding cost crack growth curve cycles damage defect density depends depth derived described determined developed deviation distribution drag effects Engineering equation equivalent estimated evaluated example expected extreme factor failure failure probability fatigue Figure force fracture frequency function geometry given important included increase indicated initial inspection integration joints limit linear load Lognormal material maximum mean measured mechanics method normal obtained offshore structures operation parameters performed period platform predicted present pressure probabilistic probability procedure random variable range ratio reference relative reliability represent requirements respectively response risk safety shown shows significant simulation standard statistical storm strength stress structure surface Table tension tether tubular uncertainty variables variation wave wave height weld