HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Jurassic Park ; Congo by Michael Crichton
Loading...

Jurassic Park ; Congo (edition 1993)

by Michael Crichton

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
1111245,441 (3.75)None
Is Michael Crichton always this preachy?

This is the second Crichton thriller I have read and the second time I have come away noticing his anti-science rants and preachy tone. This time the anti-science diatribe was delivered by the character of Malcolm, who only seems to be in the book for his chapter long anti-science rant. I've heard he is even worse with this in State of Fear.

The book itself is a decent techno-thriller. It was enjoyable and moved along swiftly. One thing I did notice, though, was a tendency to weigh the story down with details. I didn't really need to know what lines of computer code came up on the screen unless it was relevant - it wasn't. I didn't really need to see the DNA sequence typed out.

So you can see that I was less than impressed with Crichton again. The book was entertaining, but from this scientist's point of view, Crichton should have spent more time writing and less time preaching. ( )
  TysonAdams | Jun 20, 2017 |
Is Michael Crichton always this preachy?

This is the second Crichton thriller I have read and the second time I have come away noticing his anti-science rants and preachy tone. This time the anti-science diatribe was delivered by the character of Malcolm, who only seems to be in the book for his chapter long anti-science rant. I've heard he is even worse with this in State of Fear.

The book itself is a decent techno-thriller. It was enjoyable and moved along swiftly. One thing I did notice, though, was a tendency to weigh the story down with details. I didn't really need to know what lines of computer code came up on the screen unless it was relevant - it wasn't. I didn't really need to see the DNA sequence typed out.

So you can see that I was less than impressed with Crichton again. The book was entertaining, but from this scientist's point of view, Crichton should have spent more time writing and less time preaching. ( )
  TysonAdams | Jun 20, 2017 |

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (3.75)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 5
3.5 1
4 11
4.5
5 1

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 204,759,092 books! | Top bar: Always visible